Skateboarding Defies the Neoliberal Logic of the City by making it a Playground for All


Iain Borden, UCL

Skateboarding today is a global phenomenon, with around 50m riders and thousands of skate parks worldwide – it will even feature as a sport in the 2020 Olympic Games. From the full on testosterone of Thrasher skateboard magazine to the fashionable styling of Vogue, the skater girls and boys of Kabul to the Native American reservations of South Dakota, the skate parks of Brazil to the streets of Shenzhen, skateboarding is no longer just for punkish, subcultural rebels – it’s everywhere, for everyone.

Along the way, skateboarders have achieved great things in art, film, photography and DIY skate park construction, and have engaged with important matters of gender, community and professionalism, plus commerce, heritage and social enterprise.

This may come as something of a surprise to those who are mainly familiar with the stereotype of skateboarders as white teenage boys. In fact, a skater today might well be Asian and hipster cool, black and entrepreneurial, female and physically challenged, older and gay – or any other variation imaginable.

Alongside gritty urban streets, new skate terrains have emerged, from DIY constructions, flow bowls and street plazas to longboard parks, multistory wonderlands and hybrid public spaces. Skateboarding’s influence even extends to preservation, heritage, planning and urban politics.

Entering a skate shop, you are as likely to see branded shoes and t-shirts as actual skateboards. Inevitably, big companies are also involved, including the likes of Adidas, Levi’s, New Balance, Nike and Vans.

Many university academics are even now researching skateboarding, from the perspectives of sociology, gender, sexuality, sports professionalism, graphic design, architecture, politics and urbanism. Personally, I’ve been actively researching skateboarding since 1988, culminating in my new book Skateboarding and the City: a Complete History, as well as being an active skateboarder since 1977.

Play over Productivity

Most profound of all is skateboarding’s contribution to city streets and public spaces, for it remains, at heart, an urban activity. While cities are made up of housing, offices, banks, transport, universities and so forth, skateboarding makes use of these buildings without engaging with their productive activities. Freed from the strictures of regimented skate parks and the demands of organised sport, street skateboarders implicitly deny that cities should always be productive or useful.

The kind of skateboarding that rides up the walls of banks, slides down handrails and grinds across plaza ledges, disrupts the economic and functional logic of cities. Instead, skateboarding correlates with Pat Kane’s contention that our dominant work ethic should be accompanied by an equivalent “play ethic”, where play is not just personally pleasurable but also collaborative, creative and politicised.

Here, skateboarding suggests that our lives and cities should be full of mobility, pleasure and joy – and not just of sedentary labour and earnest endeavour. The result is, or should be, a city not of passive shopping malls but of vibrant bodily life.

This, perhaps, is the most overtly political space created by skateboarders: a pleasure ground carved out of the city, as a continuous reaffirmation of one of the central slogans of the 1968 strikes and student protests in Paris: that “sous les pavés, la plage” (beneath the pavement, lies the beach).

Overcoming Obstacles

Today, skateboarding in public spaces is legislated against everywhere from Brisbane and Manchester to Quebec and the Bronx. This accords with a common social fear of teenagers in general, with skaters as young adults being regularly viewed as potential muggers, robbers or worse. As US president George H.W. Bush once said of skateboarders: “Just thank God they don’t have guns” (quoted in Thrasher, March 1992, p.74).

Physical barriers are also put in place to discourage skateboarding. As the homeless are routinely excluded by “defensive architecture” such as odd-shaped benches, spikes on window ledges and sprinklers above doorways, so skaters encounter rough textured surfaces, “skatestopper” blocks, chains and scatterings of gravel, deliberately intended to ruin their run.

Yet skateboarding can be an ideal training ground for entrepreneurs and other model citizens. Skateboarders are constantly learning and inventing new tricks, which demands innovation, risk taking and an ability to learn through failure. Their typical distrust of organisations, teams and routines means they are independent minded, with a sense of personal responsibility.

Skateboarding has provided an experimental space for the likes of video artist Shaun Gladwell, film maker Spike Jonze and photographer Fred Mortagne to hone their creativity (you can find more examples here).

It can also promote community values: the Pushing Boarders events (London 2018 and Malmö 2019) are exploring diversity among skateboarders. As African American skater Karl Watson put it: “The skateboarding community embraces all ways of life, whether you are black or white, old or young – it embraces all people.”


Read more:
How skateboarding flipped its white male image and welcomed the whole world


More positive attitudes towards skateboarding are beginning to emerge, as people become aware of its economic and cultural benefits, and mindful of the need to encourage healthy physical activity among city dwellers of all ages. In cities such as Malmö, London, Brisbane, Rapids City, Coventry and Hull, public recognition for skateboarders has undoubtedly increased in the form of support for skate parks, skateable public spaces, skate-focused schools and city policy.

It seems as though skateboarding is finally being seen in its true light: critical, rebellious, non-conformist – and a dynamic presence in cities around the world.The Conversation

Iain Borden, Professor of Architecture and Urban Culture, UCL

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

The Existentialist Tradition

existentialist-tradition


This just recently arrived in the mail: The Existentialist Tradition: Selected Writings, edited by Nino Langiulli. I’m very happy to have found this book in good condition. This was my first introduction to existentialism around 10 years ago. I originally found it at the University library and the ideas contained within are thought-provoking and sometimes even profound. Very glad to have found a copy for myself all these years later. Highly recommended as an introduction to existentialism and a guide to which authors you may wish to pursue further.

Amazon Order History (2004-2008)

Wow! I logged into my old Amazon account today and checked out my order history. I actually got rid of a lot of these books a long time ago, specifically the theological ones, so I just had to catalogue it.

philosophy-books

2004

Andre LaMothe

Huston Smith

Bart D. Ehrman

John F., Dr Walvoord

Tim LaHaye

Winfried Corduan

Norman L. Geisler

Norman L. Geisler, Thomas Howe

Ron Brooks, et al

Gleason L. Archer

Erwin W. Lutzer

Felton Shoults

Trude Weiss-Rosmarin

Elaine Pagels

Karl Keating

David B. Currie

Norman L. Geisler, Ron Rhodes

Grant R. Jeffrey

William C. Placher

William C. Placher

Paul M. Johnson

Justo L. Gonzalez

Justo L. Gonzalez

Michael Gorman

Walter C. Kaiser, Moises Silva

David H. Stern

David H. Stern

Adele Berlin, et al

2005

Steve Gregg

Marvin R. Wilson

Thomas C. Brisco

Ronald H. Nash

Michael L. Brown

Michael L. Brown

Michael L. Brown

Norman L. Geisler

Walter Ralston Martin, et al

Tim Callahan

Dr. Herbert Lockyer

Victoria Hoffer, et al

by Karl Elliger (Editor), Wilhelm Rudolph (Editor)

Francis Brown, et al

Roger A. Freedman, William J., III Kaufmann

R. C. Sproul (Editor), Keith Mathison (Editor)

2006

Immanuel Kant (Author), J. M. D. Meiklejohn (Translator)

Immanuel Kant, Thomas Kingsmill Abbott (Translator)

David Hume

David Hume, Richard H. Popkin

Walter Kaufmann (Editor)

Jean-Paul Sartre, Hazel E. Barnes (Translator)

Howard V. Hong (Editor), et al

Friedrich Nietzsche, et al

Bertrand Russell

Bertrand Russell, John Perry (Introduction)

2007

Benedictus de Spinoza, et al

Aristotle, Richard McKeon (Editor)

John Locke

Rene Descartes, Donald Cress

Plato, et al

Fyodor Dostoevsky, et al

G. W. F. Hegel, et al

Lao Tzu, D. C. Lau (Translator)

George Berkeley, Roger Woolhouse

Friedrich Nietzsche (Editor), Walter Kaufmann (Translator)

William James

Gottfried Wilhelm Freiherr von Leibniz

Ludwig Wittgenstein (Author)

Brian Azzarello (Author)

2008

Epictetus (Author), George Long (Translator)


And that’s where the account order history ends. It’s definitely interesting to look back at what I was into over those years and how my interests developed and evolved!

Scribblings on the Wall

Sometimes I think it is my mission to bring faith to the faithless, and doubt to the faithful.

– Paul Tillich

sisyphus

 

Just some things that have been on my mind… completely unfocused and scrambled. I could probably make a separate post for each of these thoughts, but… nah. More of a splurge to release mental energies than a proper blog post.


I think I’m a stoic at heart, but I would never preach stoicism. I also tend to shy away from trying to destroy people’s religious faith. Maybe that’s why I don’t like Richard Dawkins very much.


Something in me wants to believe in both logical psychologism and the eternal foundation of ontological truth. I must have theologians blood running through my veins.


Semiotics could be an interesting study, if only it were an interesting subject.


Do I need to review my basic assumptions and conclusions about truth on an ontological level? Did some of my old writings about God and truth go completely in the wrong direction?


I’ve got an addiction to books. I want to own every book on this list. Maybe not even read them all. Just own them.


Sometimes people think I’ve accidentally misquoted Kant in my website tagline: I’ve simply changed the word ‘law’ to the word ‘life’ to more accurately represent my view of moral evolution.


I’ve always felt like my time in this world would be cut short somehow. But then time goes by and I don’t die. Lesson?


How could the God of the philosophers become a person? That’s like asking why there is something instead of nothing.


Sitting outside, I could see the math in everything, even in the leaves of the trees blowing in the wind.


“One word, Ma’am,” he said, coming back from the fire; limping, because of the pain. “One word. All you’ve been saying is quite right, I shouldn’t wonder. I’m a chap who always liked to know the worst and then put the best face I can on it. So I won’t deny any of what you said. But there’s one more thing to be said, even so. Suppose we have only dreamed, or made up, all those things—trees and grass and sun and moon and stars and Aslan himself. Suppose we have. Then all I can say is that, in that case, the made-up things seem a good deal more important than the real ones. Suppose this black pit of a kingdom of yours is the only world. Well, it strikes me as a pretty poor one. And that’s a funny thing, when you come to think of it. We’re just babies making up a game, if you’re right. But four babies playing a game can make a play world which licks your real world hollow. That’s why I’m going to stand by the play world. I’m on Aslan’s side even if there isn’t any Aslan to lead it. I’m going to live as like a Narnian as I can even if there isn’t any Narnia. So, thanking you kindly for our supper, if these two gentlemen and the young lady are ready, we’re leaving your court at once and setting out in the dark to spend our lives looking for Overland. Not that our lives will be very long, I should think; but that’s a small loss if the world’s as dull a place as you say.”

– C.S. Lewis, The Silver Chair

Must-Watch Movies & TV

A list of must-watch movies and television series, all according to me of course! There are so many more movies that should be on this list, but all of these have some special meaning for me. All cover photographs and descriptions are borrowed from IMDB.com.

The Fountain (2006)

As a modern-day scientist, Tommy is struggling with mortality, desperately searching for the medical breakthrough that will save the life of his cancer-stricken wife, Izzi.

Why I like it: The Fountain is like an epic love poem about impermanence and death.

Inherit the Wind (1960)

Based on a real-life case in 1925, two great lawyers argue the case for and against a science teacher accused of the crime of teaching evolution.

Why I like it: Inherit the Wind highlights some important aspects of the debate about evolution and creation.

Fight Club (1999)

An insomniac office worker, looking for a way to change his life, crosses paths with a devil-may-care soap maker, forming an underground fight club that evolves into something much, much more.

Why I like it: Fight Club touches on a lot of concepts that deal with the downsides of capitalism and society.

The Matrix (1999)

A computer hacker learns from mysterious rebels about the true nature of his reality and his role in the war against its controllers.

Why I like it: The Matrix is a nice introduction to some of the basic ideas that comprise a study of metaphysics.

Luther (2003)

During the early 16th Century idealistic German monk Martin Luther, disgusted by the materialism in the church, begins the dialogue that will lead to the Protestant Reformation.

Why I like it: Luther highlights an incredibly important period of Western history.

Dead Poet’s Society (1989)

English teacher John Keating inspires his students to look at poetry with a different perspective of authentic knowledge and feelings.

Why I like it: Dead Poets Society is a celebration of life and is a testament to the importance of the Humanities.

Requiem for a Dream (2000)

The drug-induced utopias of four Coney Island people are shattered when their addictions run deep.

Why I like it: Requiem for a Dream exposes the dark side of drug use and abuse, both illicit and pharmaceutical.

V for Vendetta (2005)

In a future British tyranny, a shadowy freedom fighter, known only by the alias of “V”, plots to overthrow it with the help of a young woman.

Why I like it: V for Vendetta presents in a fictional model the possibilities and dangers of authoritarian government.

I Heart Huckabees (2004)

A husband-and-wife team play detective, but not in the traditional sense. Instead, the happy duo helps others solve their existential issues, the kind that keep you up at night, wondering what it all means.

Why I like it: I Heart Huckabees is a hilarious examination of existentialism and existential psychology.

Back to the Future (1985)

Marty McFly, a 17-year-old high school student, is accidentally sent 30 years into the past in a time-traveling DeLorean invented by his close friend, the maverick scientist Doc Brown.

Why I like it: Back to the Future opens up the imagination to the possibilities of scientific discovery.

The NeverEnding Story (1984)

neverending-story

A troubled boy dives into a wondrous fantasy world through the pages of a mysterious book.

Why I like it: The NeverEnding Story was a movie that I watched many times as a child and it holds a deeper meaning about nothingness and human creativity that I probably did not comprehend as a child.

The Boondock Saints (1999)

Fraternal twins set out to rid Boston of the evil men operating there while being tracked down by an FBI agent.

Why I like it: The Boondock Saints explores the morality behind simply destroying (what we consider) evil men.

Waking Life (2001)

A man shuffles through a dream meeting various people and discussing the meanings and purposes of the universe.

Why I like it: Waking Life takes a bunch of philosophical concepts and mashes them into one artistic compendium.

American History X (1998)

american-history-x

A former neo-nazi skinhead tries to prevent his younger brother from going down the same wrong path that he did.

Why I like it: American History X explores the ideas and dangers of blind racism.

A Beautiful Mind (2001)

After John Nash, a brilliant but asocial mathematician, accepts secret work in cryptography, his life takes a turn for the nightmarish.

Why I like it: A Beautiful Mind examines the life of an intellectually gifted man that suffered from paranoid schizophrenia.

Into the Wild (2007)

After graduating from Emory University, top student and athlete Christopher McCandless abandons his possessions, gives his entire $24,000 savings account to charity and hitchhikes to Alaska to live in the wilderness. Along the way, Christopher encounters a series of characters that shape his life.

Why I like it: Into the Wild is all about simplifying life and finding oneself in nature.

Office Space (1999)

Three company workers who hate their jobs decide to rebel against their greedy boss.

Why I like it: Office Space offers an intensely fun perspective on meaningless labor.

Silence (2016)

In the 17th century, two Portuguese Jesuit priests travel to Japan in an attempt to locate their mentor, who is rumored to have committed apostasy, and to propagate Catholicism.

Why I like it: Silence explores the clashing of worldviews and offers a unique and insightful perspective on religion and the faithful.

The Discovery (2017)

A love story set one year after the existence of the afterlife is scientifically verified.

Why I like it: The Discovery has a very interesting premise that serves to present some even more interesting ideas.


Lost (2004-2010)

The survivors of a plane crash are forced to work together in order to survive on a seemingly deserted tropical island.

Why I like it: Lost contains so much food for thought throughout the development of its various characters and events.

Mad Men (2007-2015)

A drama about one of New York’s most prestigious ad agencies at the beginning of the 1960s, focusing on one of the firm’s most mysterious but extremely talented ad executives, Donald Draper.

Why I like it: Mad Men provides an interesting look into the business world and private lives of people in the 1960’s.

Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey (2014)

A documentary series that explores how we discovered the laws of nature and found our coordinates in space and time.

Why I like it: Cosmos is a great introduction to the science behind contemporary cosmology.

Breaking Bad (2008-2013)

A high school chemistry teacher diagnosed with inoperable lung cancer turns to manufacturing and selling methamphetamine in order to secure his family’s future.

Why I like it: Breaking Bad explores in highly dramatic form the thoughts and actions of a semi-nihilistic/narcissistic man and the violent consequences of his actions.

House of Cards (2013- )

A Congressman works with his equally conniving wife to exact revenge on the people who betrayed him.

Why I like it: House of Cards offers a fictionalized look into the cutthroat world of politics.

Game of Thrones (2011- )

Nine noble families fight for control over the mythical lands of Westeros; A forgotten race returns after being dormant for thousands of years.

Why I like it: Game of Thrones is an epic tale that explores morality and politics in many forms.

The Walking Dead (2010- )

Sheriff Deputy Rick Grimes wakes up from a coma, to learn the world is in ruins, and must lead a group of survivors to stay alive.

Why I like it: The Walking Dead offers some insight into the human condition and explores what lies at the heart of humanity.

Westworld (2016 – )

Set at the intersection of the near future and the reimagined past, explore a world in which every human appetite can be indulged without consequence.

Why I like it: Alongside raising questions of human nature, Westworld explores the complications involved in the development of artificial intelligence ranging from ethical to existential concerns.

Black Mirror (2011- )

A television anthology series that shows the dark side of life and technology.

Why I like it: Black Mirror takes some really interesting ideas and presents them as possible technological disasters in the near future.


I could keep going and have probably missed some real gems, but that’s all for now! Maybe I’ll do books next time… or video games?

The Aging Paradox

This quote from Waking Life has popped into my head quite a bit recently:

I can remember thinking, “Oh, someday, like in my mid-thirties maybe, everything’s going to just somehow gel and settle, just end.” It was like there was this plateau, and it was waiting for me, and I was climbing up it, and when I got to the top, all growth and change would stop. Even exhilaration. But that hasn’t happened like that, thank goodness. I think that what we don’t take into account when we’re young is our endless curiosity. That’s what’s so great about being human.

I feel like a lot of my time has been spent climbing toward some philosophical or ideological plateau – some time and place where there is no more need to philosophize, where everything has been solved for eternity. Where I’d have the answer to every metaphysical and ethical dilemma. That’s what used to intrigue me about Christianity. Things were concrete, they were set in stone for all time. There’s a certain comfort to that. But the older I get, the more I realize that everything is in a constantly changing process with everything else. I will never be finished with philosophy. I don’t think that would even be possible. The nature of this universe – of perception, of time and change – can produce infinite results. So I guess I’m not climbing toward anything really. But life’s about the journey, not the destination, right? What I do know is that I am growing and changing. To what end? God only knows.

The Filter Bubble

A world constructed from the familiar is a world in which there’s nothing to learn … (since there is) invisible autopropaganda, indoctrinating us with our own ideas.

– Eli Pariser

A filter bubble is a result of a personalized search in which a website algorithm selectively guesses what information a user would like to see based on information about the user (such as location, past click behavior and search history) and, as a result, users become separated from information that disagrees with their viewpoints, effectively isolating them in their own cultural or ideological bubbles. Prime examples are Google Personalized Search results and Facebook’s personalized news stream. The term was coined by internet activist Eli Pariser in his book by the same name; according to Pariser, users get less exposure to conflicting viewpoints and are isolated intellectually in their own informational bubble. Pariser related an example in which one user searched Google for “BP” and got investment news about British Petroleum while another searcher got information about the Deepwater Horizon oil spill and that the two search results pages were “strikingly different”. The bubble effect may have negative implications for civic discourse, according to Pariser, but there are contrasting views suggesting the effect is minimal and addressable.

. . . . .

Consider trying out the DuckDuckGo search engine and the uBlock Origin browser extension.

See Also

How Web Sites Vary Prices Based on Your Information

Is Google Making Us Stupid?

Facebook’s Political Influence Under a Microscope

Don’t Bubble Us

Don’t Track Us

411VM #28 (1998)

Skateboarding used to be one of my great passions. I was never a team sport type of guy, but skating offered a form of personal development and discipline that was unique unto itself. And it was more than just a sport. It was a lifestyle and an art form. There was always a new trick to master or a new challenge to face. Everybody had their own personal style, which made it rewarding to just observe others and watch them grow alongside myself. There was a strong sense of community and comradery among us skaters. Every day I would watch this video to get myself pumped for a day full of exploring the city for new spots to hone my skills. The self-discovery and self-mastery that skateboarding offered was something that I will never forget and never regret.

me skating

Me in the mid-2000’s